- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:27:38 -0600
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
I don't mind, but I would love to understand just what GRDDL people (Dan?) think will magically happen if there is a profile parameter. The profile value we have defined should at this point be meaningless to any GRDDL processor, and there is nothing I know of that would implement GRDDL for RDFa that the working group has blessed. What am I missing (this time) ? Ben Adida wrote: > > Ivan Herman wrote: >> +1 (including an extra test without) > > As long as we have at least one test without, I'm okay with adding > @profile to the test cases. > > -Ben -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2008 19:28:06 UTC