- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:32:02 -0800
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > > Mark Birbeck wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> There's no obligation to include the @profile value in a document that >> uses RDFa, > > Well, the spec says there is some obligation: There's agreement on the RDFa team that we meant this to be encouraged, not obligated. If we used the wrong terminology for this, then it's a bug in how we're using the terminology, not an agreement that this be an obligation. I know we've clearly stated that before on the mailing list and specifically in my response to Sean [1] that the entire Working Group saw, so let's not play word games :) -Ben [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Feb/0024.html
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 19:32:41 UTC