Laurens, We formally considered the issue you brought up regarding @cite, which is ISSUE-109: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109 Our resolution was along the lines of what Mark already mentioned in his email: we considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We chose to defer this issue to a future version of RDFa. Let us know if that is an acceptable resolution for you, as far as RDFa 1.0 is concerned. Thanks, -BenReceived on Wednesday, 30 April 2008 05:08:47 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:01:56 UTC