Re: Comments on RDFa in XHTML Syntax draft [ISSUE-109]

Laurens,

We formally considered the issue you brought up regarding @cite, which 
is ISSUE-109:

http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/109

Our resolution was along the lines of what Mark already mentioned in his 
email: we considered @cite but realized that many other attributes would 
then require RDFa interpretation and that doing so is not simple. We 
chose to defer this issue to a future version of RDFa.

Let us know if that is an acceptable resolution for you, as far as RDFa 
1.0 is concerned.

Thanks,

-Ben