- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:58:22 -0700
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- CC: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, W3C RDFa task force <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Shane McCarron wrote: > This has nothing to do with href. Really? Did we indeed vote to disallow: <div href="[_:foo]"> ? I think I would be okay if we had, but even so, having different syntax for URIs in @resource and @href would be quite confusing: <a href="http://example.org" resource="<http://example.org/alternate>"> Changing the way URIs are written in HTML... that's some pretty risky stuff. I'm *much* more in favor of thinking about better ways to represent CURIEs, even if they require a few more characters. (To make things worse, I'm pretty sure you have to XML-escape the < and > characters inside attribute values if you want things to validate, and that gets quite ugly.) -Ben
Received on Monday, 14 April 2008 20:59:00 UTC