- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:46:50 -0500
- To: "Ralph R. Swick" <swick@w3.org>
- CC: Mark <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Err..... I updated the editor's draft to reflect the typeof decision the day we did it. http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/2008/ED-rdfa-syntax-20080403/ Ralph R. Swick wrote: > Mark, Shane; > > Any chance we could get a new editor's draft of RDFa Syntax > early next week that has the @instanceof renamed to @typeof > and the revised processing rule language, per our resolutions > [1,2] to issues 101 [3] and 102 [4] of last week? > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html#item02 > [2] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/03-rdfa-minutes.html#item03 > [3] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/101 > [4] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/track/issues/102 > > Mark, you had indicated the changes to the processing rule > prose would be simple. Ben has promised to do a new > "clean room" implementation as soon as we have the new > language. > > Also, at this week's SWD telecon [5], the task force was directed > to post a message to the mailing lists we used for the Last Call > announcement (and specifically the W3C chairs list) informing the > community of these two changes in lieu of publishing an updated > Last Call WD. > > [5] http://www.w3.org/2008/04/08-swd-minutes.html#item04 > > I am happy to send the change notice (or draft it for Ben to send) > once I have the exact new processing rule language in hand. > If I can copy and paste it from an updated editor's draft, that > would be perfect. > > Given that folks will be starting their journeys to Beijing pretty > soon, I think it's fairly important to have this done by early > next week. > > Thanks; I know you must be very busy with your own Beijing prep too. > > -Ralph > -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 11 April 2008 16:47:42 UTC