Re: question re triples in xml literals

Hi Benjamin,

> ... but for now RDFa is at least a clear winner against RDF/XML
> (seriously, RDFa is a great replacement syntax for RDF/XML graph
> serializations, as it's both human and machine readable and
> allows browsing between graphs when each graph is serialized
> as a stand-alone RDFa document. That's a huge use case, too)

Obviously the real test of that is yet to come..but I do agree with you. :)

You've reminded me as well, that I saw an interesting use-case last
year where someone was using RDFa to add metadata to RDF/XML
documents! I don't recall the specific requirement, but it would be
interesting to track it down.

Regards,

Mark

-- 
  Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer

  mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232
  http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com

  standards. innovation.

Received on Tuesday, 23 October 2007 14:10:31 UTC