Simone, you should also quote the reply of Harry (Chair of the GRDDL WG): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Sep/0008.html ie, the GRDDL group would still prefer to keep the profile attribute in its old format... And his arguments are also valid for RDFa, I believe. ivan Simone Onofri wrote: >>> Personally, I believe the profile >>> http://www.w3.org/ns/rdfa/ >>> should be used which has been secured by Ralph a while ago... >> At which level? profile attribute of XHTML 1.0? >> The issue with the profile attribute is that in a cut and paste >> scenario, people will forget to modify the "head" and/or will not >> have write access to the head section of an HTML document. >> >> Is there a way to locally trigger the mode, in the HTML itself. >> > > There a are similar question on GRDDL for use of head/@profile in > XHTML 2 [1]. So XHTML 2 WG proposed to use [2]: > > [[ > > Instead of > > <head profile="http://www.w3.org/..."> > > you now write > > <head> > <link rel="profile" href="http://www.w3.org/..."/> > > since this is more consistent with how metadata is expressed in XHTML2. > > ]] > > Cheers, > > Simone > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2007/09/05-grddl-wg-minutes.html#item08 > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xhtml2/2007Sep/0002.html > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 08:04:52 UTC