- From: Hausenblas, Michael <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:41:20 +0200
- To: <boland@nist.gov>
- Cc: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>, "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, <www-qa@w3.org>
Tim, Thanks for the pointer - very interesting stuff! Cheers, Michael ---------------------------------------------------------- Michael Hausenblas, MSc. Institute of Information Systems & Information Management JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ ---------------------------------------------------------- >-----Original Message----- >From: boland@nist.gov [mailto:boland@nist.gov] >Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:54 PM >To: Hausenblas, Michael >Cc: Karl Dubost; Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task >force; www-qa@w3.org >Subject: RE: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in >(approved) test 0009 > >fyi - there is also a review process for WCAG2.0 Test Samples >Development Task >Force [1] > >Best, Tim Boland NIST > >[1]: http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/process > > >Quoting "Hausenblas, Michael" <michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at>: > >> >> >> Karl, >> >> As a matter of practice, we now have (IMHO) a stable process. >> >> First, whenever someone raises test cases (or proposes >> concrete ones, such as done by Ivan [1] or Fabien [2]) >> the TF puts it on the agenda (see for example [3]). >> >> We then regularly do the review & approval in the TF >> (note that there is a tool supporting this process >> available at [4]). The decisions (approve/on hold/reject/) >> on each TC are finally recorded at [5]. >> >> This is the process as practiced and it seems to work fine ;) >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> >> [1] >> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007 Oct/0001.html >> [2] >> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2007 Sep/0069.html >> [3] http://www.w3.org/2007/10/04-rdfa-minutes#item02 >> [4] http://sw.joanneum.at/rdfa/rdfadebug/index.php >> [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/wiki/RDFaTC >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> Michael Hausenblas, MSc. >> Institute of Information Systems & Information Management >> JOANNEUM RESEARCH Forschungsgesellschaft mbH >> >> http://www.joanneum.at/iis/ >> ---------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Karl Dubost [mailto:karl@w3.org] >> >Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 11:07 AM >> >To: Hausenblas, Michael >> >Cc: Dan Connolly; Ivan Herman; W3C RDFa task force; www-qa@w3.org >> >Subject: Re: How to handle a Test Suite at W3C Re: Error in >> >(approved) test 0009 >> > >> >Hi Michael >> > >> >Hausenblas, Michael (7 août 2007 - 15:10) : >> >> However, what is missing IMHO are clear instructions how >> >> to actually do the test *review*. >> > >> >Did you made progress on this, or did you decide of a Process? >> > >> >-- >> >Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >> >W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead >> > QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/ >> > *** Be Strict To Be Cool *** >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2007 07:41:52 UTC