- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2007 14:17:51 +0100
- To: "Ivan Herman" <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: "W3C RDFa task force" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Hi Ivan, > this has nothing to do with the content of your mail but made me ask > something else (and it seems that I still get into the CURIE trap > time-to-time so I prefer to ask). > > You write instanceof="[foaf:PersonalProfileDocument]" in all your > examples. My understanding is that the value of instanceof (just like > @rel, @rev is %QName.datatype; (from the DTD), ie, the '[' is > unnecessary in these examples. Is it so that '[' is _allowed_ for cases > when the value is CURIE? My current understanding was that safe curies > are used when the value is defined to be a URI (ie, for @href, > @resource, and @about) but not elsewhere. The syntax document does not > make it clear either. (If Safe CURIE is allowed anywhere where QNAME is > allowed, then I will have to modify my code, too...). > > Note that all of our examples uses the distinction I made, so if safe > curie is allowed for qname-s, too, we should have this in the various > examples. Yes, I really do apologise for causing confusion--Niklas spotted that too. I began with the @resource example and then cut-and-paste to produce the @instanceof examples, but didn't remove the square brackets. Many apologies... Mark -- Mark Birbeck, formsPlayer mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com | +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 http://www.formsPlayer.com | http://internet-apps.blogspot.com standards. innovation.
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 13:18:11 UTC