- From: Sean B. Palmer <sean@miscoranda.com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:54:05 +0000
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Nov 26, 2007 2:43 AM, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org> wrote: > would the following be a solution for you? > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" > xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" > version="xhtml11 rdfa svg"> In what specification would the interpretation of the @version values be given? Would they be extensible by users other than the W3C? I'm not sure they'd need to be extensible, admittedly. It's been suggested to me that you meant for @version to be a hook for namespace GRDDL to dispatch off of; is that something that you thought about? This *would* solve the RDFa discovery problem for me, but I'm not sure how well it would work as a discovery mechanism in general, especially given the extensibility question and so on. From what Mark and Shane have said, it sounds like they're only considering @profile at the moment. See also http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#standardizedFieldValues-51 -- Sean B. Palmer, http://inamidst.com/sbp/
Received on Friday, 30 November 2007 12:54:22 UTC