Re: PROPOSAL: Using @resource to define objects that are resources from Ben Adida on 2007-05-26 (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from May 2007)

From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:46:41 -0700
To: Keith Alexander <keithalexander@keithalexander.co.uk>
CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-ID: <46579F91.8030607@adida.net>

Keith Alexander wrote:
> 
> On a related note, can anyone confirm that @content is intended purely
> for machine-readable content? (ie: will it suffer the same problems as
> using @title  has in microformats, or not?)

Yes, it is intended purely for machine-readable content. It is there for
those cases where we must sadly give up on DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself),
e.g. on timestamps, and have different machine-readable and
human-readable versions of the data.

-Ben

Received on Saturday, 26 May 2007 02:46:49 UTC