Re: PROPOSAL: Using @resource to define objects that are resources from Keith Alexander on 2007-05-24 (public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from May 2007)

From: Keith Alexander <keithalexander@keithalexander.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 16:47:22 +0100
CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Message-ID: <4655B38A.90601@keithalexander.co.uk>

Shane McCarron wrote:
>
> Just to be clear, are you suggesting that @content now be a URI type 
> instead of a CDATA type?  To date content has been a way of specifying 
> content for a property when you do not want to use the actual content 
> of the element in question.  I think, anyway.
>
On a related note, can anyone confirm that @content is intended purely 
for machine-readable content? (ie: will it suffer the same problems as 
using @title  has in microformats, or not?)

Keith

Received on Thursday, 24 May 2007 15:47:04 UTC