- From: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:16:12 -0500
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, SWD WG <public-swd-wg@w3.org>
Ivan, I've applied changes according to your comments below, and the result is now live at: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/SWD/RDFa/scenarios/ (soon to be snapshot for the WG.) Ivan Herman wrote: > Use case #2 > > Last paragraph: "the structured data contains the complete iCal and > Dublin Core metadata" (the DC is missing). As the issue is the easy mix > of vocabularies, this is good to be emphasized I wanted to emphasize iCal separately, but I've added something to point out DC, too. > Use case #3 > > I am not sure which feature this use cases puts forward, to be honest. > Also: the reference to XHTML2 seems to be besides to point for the use > case, and would just add mud to the water:-) (In my view at least.) I took out the reference to XHTML2, as I agree that it's not the main point here. However, I'd like to keep this use case as it's an important one for the publishing community (Bob DuCharme and, previously, IPTC.) > Use case #4 > > Last sentence: do we want that? We have *not* added such specific, > technical requirements in the previous use cases. I wonder whether we > should do it here... Yes, I think we do want it. It's important to point out that RDFa should play nicely with existing HTML. > Use case #6 > > I think the reference is wrong and the text should refer to Use Case #5 > (furnishing information...). Indeed! Fixed. > Use case #7 > > We should somehow emphasize that Patrick uses, for his annotation, large > ontologies that the medical domain has developed over the years (maybe > we could even pick two of those) I've added wording to this effect and a reference to UNIPROT. I'm also waiting for some feedback from Science Commons to beef up this use case. -Ben
Received on Tuesday, 30 January 2007 15:17:27 UTC