- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 14:51:54 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4624C2EA.6050502@w3.org>
+1 with all your arguments! Ivan Ben Adida wrote: > (Chair hat off) > > Mark Birbeck wrote: > > [...] > >> My point about starting with a 'mental model' is only to suggest that >> we look at how something fits with existing HTML, and existing >> practice. The idea was simply that if we're happy with the model we >> can look at how we explain it to other people. (It's actually how >> nearly everything in RDFa has been designed, just not always >> explicitly.) > > So, I'm not happy with the model of adding HREF everywhere in something > called XHTML1.1+RDFa. Mark, you've always pointed out that RDFa is > primarily aimed at HTML authors adding semantic markup. I mostly agree > with you. With that assumption, I can only imagine an HTML author being > thoroughly confused by HREF everywhere, wondering, "where's the > clickable link? How do I *make* it clickable?". Why would an HTML author > do this? What is the use case that would lead him to put an HREF on a > DIV as far as the HTML author is concerned? This adds a whole level of > inherently invisible metadata, where the primary goal of RDFa is to mark > up visible data. > > Regarding acceptability of this approach, I'm in full agreement with > Ivan on this: the backlash against this will be enormous. We *have* to > plan for it, and, more importantly, we have to ask ourselves: what is > the cost/benefit of this quasi-ensured backlash? I see a high cost, and > I don't see the benefit wrt our goals. > > Finally, the biggest worry I have is regarding the perception of this > change. If we add HREF in a bunch of places, we're really changing the > document model for HTML in ways that even adding REL didn't do (since > that is still about marking up visible content). It's not XHTML1.1 > anymore. It's clearly XHTML1.2. And the perception will be that we're > trying to squeeze XHTML2 features into XHTML1 via RDFa. That is a > dangerous proposition: we should not make RDFa an even bigger lightning > bolt for criticism, if we can help it. > > -Ben -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:51:30 UTC