- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:33:46 -0500
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- CC: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>, RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Dan Connolly wrote: > I wonder how this interacts with the "RDFa in HTML" thread. > In some sense it's orthogonal. Or is this meant to exclude > those designs? > IMHO it is meant to accommodate them - HTML has a media type, so if there is an HTML+RDFa it should use that media type. > By "XHTML WG", do you mean the XHTML 2 WG or the HTML WG? Or > does it matter? > The XHTML 2 WG is what we were talking about at the time. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Tuesday, 17 April 2007 12:34:31 UTC