- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 15:49:26 +0200
- To: Ben Adida <ben@adida.net>
- CC: RDFa <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <46237EE6.4030400@w3.org>
Ben Adida wrote: > 1) should we define the RDFa module to allow for HREF on any element? > I would like to see strong RDFa use cases for this need. My trick on my home page was to use <a href="blabla" rev="..." style="display:none"> </a> which covered most of my needs:-) It is a bit ugly, but it works... (in case one wants to add some RDF links here and there...) > 2) if so, should we ask XHTML1.1+RDFa-compliant agents to make these > elements clickable. > I would not expect that to happen, let us be realistic. In view of the current mood around HTML and HTML agents, the maximum we can expect is that the HTML group would define a way to add attributes to the current HTML elements that would not require any change on the HTML agents' core behaviour (ignoring unknown attributes is already part of this behaviour, I would expect). Anything more than that will simply not happen in the coming years. On the other hand... you are right that 1) without 2) sounds bad. I guess this is an argument against 1), too > A related issue is whether the XHTML1.1 RDFa module should allow LINK > and META inside the body, where XHTML1.1 does not. > Again, from a 'political' point of view, I think it is better not to go there. HTML browsers might be much more prepared to accept (and ignore) new attributes; I would expect much more push back on a change in the content model. > Let's discuss! > You mean: let the tempest begin!:-) Ivan > -Ben > -- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead URL: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ PGP Key: http://www.cwi.nl/%7Eivan/AboutMe/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Monday, 16 April 2007 13:48:50 UTC