- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 07:57:06 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- CC: mark.birbeck@x-port.net, Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, HTML WG <w3c-html-wg@w3.org>
>>> - I also have the impression that we got to a nice equilibrium point on >>> the literal datatype discussion on the mailing list (see the thread >>> starting at [1]), but this is not reflected in the document (maybe I >>> have just missed it). >> There has been a lot of discussion on this in two or three subsequent >> telecons, and the equilibrium that was reached was unfortunately a >> negative one; that we would lose something whichever side we came down >> on. We were therefore waiting for an action item from Elias to be >> completed, which would identify what the problems with the _current_ >> solution are from the point of view of triple stores, and then >> hopefully we can wrap this up one way or the other. >> I have not had time to attend the meetings, let alone do my todo on investigating many ontologies to find the most used. I wasn't worried because I too thought that we were aiming at consensus on the new style and not the current. Where are we/you on this? current or new hybrid approach? > > Oh, not again...:-) I really liked what we ended up with, it looked like > a perfect base for a consensus... -Elias
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2007 11:57:04 UTC