- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:30:29 +0000
- To: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- CC: "'Ben Adida'" <ben@mit.edu>, "'Booth, David \(HP Software - Boston\)'" <dbooth@hp.com>, "'SWBPD list'" <public-swbp-wg@w3.org>, "'public-rdf-in-xhtml task force'" <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>
Mark Birbeck wrote: > One part of the problem is that the whole point of RDF/A is to be able to > carry metadata within a 'normal' document. This means that *by definition* > we have what could be perceived as two resources at the same URL--we have an > XHTML document, and we have metadata for that document. Both are 'carried' > by the same set of XML elements, but how they are *processed* depends on the > agent retrieving them. It seems to me that the TAG work on fragment > identifiers does not allow for this possibility, since it says that if the > document is XHTML, then a fragment identifier must be referring to an XML > element. (In passing this seems wrong to me anyway, since it is supposed to > be up to the user agent to make use of the fragment identifier.) strong agreement. (no additional argument though!) Jeremy
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 12:47:46 UTC