- From: Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:47:38 -0400
- To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
- CC: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Besides everything on my email [1] we could go over a couple of things. For example, the fact that rel="has multiple relationships" bit me the other day. """The processor rule is simple: each of these attributes generates exactly one triple.""" I'm not sure whether it's needed to say that each of those attributes may have multiple values. :) Another is the lack of text defining datatype="plaintext" and the overuse of rdfs:XMLLiteral. One last one for now is that I was pointed by Eric van der Vlist that the XHTML 2.0 spec [2] says that if datatype is not defined the default value is xsd:string. If you think these warrant a call, I'll be glad to join in. -Elias [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Jun/0008.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml2-20060726/mod-metaAttributes.html#adef_metaAttributes_datatype Mark Birbeck wrote: > Hi Elias, > > Would you have the issues that you were thinking of bringing up ready > for the call today? > > The general plan that we're following at the moment is of focusing on > implentations for the immediate period. We are also looking at > resolving issues ready for another draft in the autumn, but I'm not > sure it's fair on Ben to discuss issues today whilst he's away. ;) So > anything to do with the implementation of RDFa would be ideal fodder > for a call today. > > All the best, > > Mark > > > On 20/08/06, Elias Torres <elias@torrez.us> wrote: >> I'm for it if no other personal scheduling conflicts arise. I had a >> series of things to bring up as per my interactions with users of my >> RDFa extractor. I had them fresh for last week's meeting but I never >> wrote them down. I'm also waiting for Ben's answers to Lee and I's >> feedback on the syntax spec. >> >> What are our milestones? Is there another update to the spec scheduled? >> >> -Elias >> >> Mark Birbeck wrote: >> > >> > Hi Ben, >> > >> > No problem...deadlines, we understand. ;) >> > >> > If others are up for a call, then I'm happy to go ahead. >> > >> > All the best, >> > >> > Mark >> > >> > >> > On 20/08/06, Ben Adida <ben@mit.edu> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Well, I hate to make excuses, but the last stretch of my thesis >> editing >> >> is simply keeping me far far too busy. I've been completely unable to >> >> keep any of my other commitments. >> >> >> >> Mark, if you'd like to lead a telecon, please do go ahead! I will be >> >> back on track in 2 weeks, but right now, I have to be realistic: the >> >> thesis has to take precedence, as my end-of-summer deadline is >> >> non-negotiable. >> >> >> >> -Ben >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >
Received on Tuesday, 22 August 2006 12:48:01 UTC