- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:25:48 -0600
- To: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, public-swbp-wg@w3.org, iptc-metadata@yahoogroups.com
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:43 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote: [...] > Within our standards, each news provider is free to use their own > taxonomies, eg of subjects, entities, genres, etc. So there are > no "well-known" prefixes to hardwire. Oh. Well, then you'll have to transmit the full URIs somehow. I got the impression that the xmlns declarations introduced a lot of redundancy. But if the taxonomies are completely unconstrained, then I don't see how you'll do substantially better than xmlns declarations. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 14:25:56 UTC