- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 06:36:01 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Hi Mark and others, We've been spending a lot of time discussing CURIEs at the IPTC meeting taking place this week in Milan and were very glad to see the CURIE Note and the updated RDF/A document. We have one big problem, though, and that is this ... We plan to use CURIEs for everything, including the principal taxonomies themselves, as well as all the related info, like @role, @creator, @type, etc. If you go to: http://www.iptc.org/NewsCodes/ you will see that we currently have nearly 30 taxonomies for things like Colorspace, Genre, Of Interest To (ie Audience), Provider, Scene, Status, Subject, Topic Type, Videocoder, ... So a news story with even a moderate number of codes will easily have 20 or more prefix declarations. If we assume an average size of 50 bytes, that makes 1,000 bytes of prefix declarations. And this is probably quite a conservative estimate. As we are very concerned about bandwidth, we have been thinking of allowing the use of XInclude to place the prefix declarations outside of the news story. Now we think (possibly wrongly) that XInclude may not permit the inclusion of arbitrary snippets of text, at any point in the XML document, eg the inclusion of the string: xmlns:nc="http://www.iptc.org/NewsCodes#" at the point shown with "^" below: <news:item > ^ Having skimmed the (quite dense) XInclude spec, we're still not quite sure. Prior to seeing the CURIE Note, we had decided to borrow a prefix declaration syntax from Schematron, eg (these are made-up examples): <ns prefix="nc" uri="http://www.iptc.org/NewsCodes#"/> <ns prefix="lang" uri="http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/bcp/bcp47.txt#"/> <ns prefix="curr" uri="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_4217#"/> We believe that XInclude would not get indigestion when presented with the above. Any comments on the above would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Misha ----------------------------------------------------------------- Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com To find out more about Reuters Products and Services visit http://www.reuters.com/productinfo Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 05:36:08 UTC