- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:13:01 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, tantek@technorati.com
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 13:47 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > Hi Danny, > > Le vendredi 20 mai 2005 à 11:52 +0200, Danny Ayers a écrit : > > If I understand the new GRDDL draft [1] correctly, a compatible > > document would firstly include a reference to the data-view profile to > > say "transformations of this doc have the same meaning as this doc" - > > <head profile="http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view"> > > > > This would be the same for all microformats. > > Actually, this is even more flexible than that; you don't need to get > all microformats to adopt the GRDDL profile; as long as they do have a > profile (as XFN does), then you can put the relevant information > directly in the profile document itself, and all the documents > referencing this profile would become GRDDLable. > > To take the XFN example in more details: This example is explained and illustrated in the spec... "Analogously, consider a profile document whose information content includes ..." http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/grddl/#ns-bind The example there is "real" in that it's available in the web: http://www.w3.org/2003/g/td/friends See also the N3 behind the diagram... http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/grddl/figGleanProfile.n3 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E see you at XTech in Amsterdam 24-27 May?
Received on Friday, 20 May 2005 13:13:05 UTC