- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:01:28 +0000
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Thinking a little more about implementing this, I find that I need a resolution mechanism to determine what script to run given the namespace of the XML root element. Hold on while I prepare a fox hole to duck into ... What I'd rather have is the url of the transform right there in the xml document, and I wonder about using the same machanism as browsers use to specify a stylesheet, i.e a processing instruction. Diving for foxhole now ... Brian Dan Connolly wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 08:41, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > >>Le sam 17/01/2004 à 00:00, Dan Connolly a écrit : >> >>>That was a great start. After working thru various technical >>>details (grokRDDL and such) I found some inspiration to do >>>some writing today. What do you think of this new draft? >> >>Looks great! (FWIW, I've fixed a few typos spotted by ,spell) > > > I moved the history/rationale to separate page: > > GRDDL Background: Design History and Rationale > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/specbg.html > $Revision: 1.2 $ of $Date: 2004/01/20 23:23:51 $ by $Author: connolly $ > > <- > http://www.w3.org/2004/01/rdxh/spec > $Revision: 1.19 $ $Date: 2004/01/20 23:24:05 $ > > Tim, I'm thinking about specbg as a TAG finding on > issue 35. >
Received on Monday, 26 January 2004 12:03:19 UTC