- From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:10:47 -0400
- To: "Aaron Swartz" <me@aaronsw.com>, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Friday 27 June 2003 11:12, Aaron Swartz wrote: > I didn't think of this at the time. If I get a chance to change things, > CC will probably recommend: > > <script type="application/rdf+xml"><!-- > <rdf:RDF ... /> > --></script> Well, we might have a XHTML+RDF document type by then! <smile/> But since we're on the topic, we've been trying to understand the various requirements of the scenarios, an in CC's case, are your properties "flat"? If so, why didn't you use the meta encoding techniques that Dave described [1]? For example, <link rel="schema.cc" href="http://web.resource.org/cc/"/> <meta name="cc:license" content="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode"> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2003Jun/0015
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 12:10:49 UTC