Re: Validating XHTML with embedded RDF

Joseph Reagle wrote:
> Assessment: These are architecturally inelegant -- though I actually 
> prefer
> the script element over comments and wonder what led CC to use a 
> comment...
> These are the solutions to beat.

I didn't think of this at the time. If I get a chance to change things, 
CC will probably recommend:

<script type="application/rdf+xml"><!--
<rdf:RDF ... />
--></script>
-- 
Aaron Swartz: http://www.aaronsw.com/

Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 11:12:36 UTC