- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 03 Jul 2003 17:00:00 -0500
- To: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 16:25, Joseph Reagle wrote: > On Tuesday 01 July 2003 17:57, Dan Connolly wrote: > > Hmm... in a way, it does provide a design constraint: it answers > > all the questions about whether RDF inside <blockquote> is > > to be taken literally or not; i.e. it makes sure the solution > > addresses the TAG issue > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#RDFinXHTML-35 > > Not necessarily. I haven't seen any evidence that the issue is a compelling > requirement in the context of immediate issues we are hoping to address. > CC, FOAF, Trackbacks, DC all seem most easily addressable by having > semantically context free RDF chunks with a properly specified rdf:about > attribute. Er... hang on; you asked me what my requirement is. I told you. You can decline to accept my requirement, but you can't deny that I require it. I don't expect the TAG to close its issue until there's a design that makes it clear whether RDF inside <blockquote> is to be taken at face value or not. If they do, it'll be over my objection. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 18:00:09 UTC