Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ?

On 03/25/2013 03:17 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:
> Same here... +1

Okay, I'm hearing consensus on this, so I'll go ahead with it.

     -- Sandro



> Axel
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Birte Glimm [mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de]
>> Sent: Sonntag, 24. März 2013 12:18
>> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ?
>>
>> +1 to the yellow box.
>>
>> Birte
>>
>> On 21 March 2013 15:36, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/03/13 13:35, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mar 21, 2013 9:28 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org
>>>> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
>>>>   >
>>>>   > Take a look at this:
>>>>   >
>>>>   >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
>>>>   >>
>>>>   > Notice the yellow box?   Should we do that for
>>>>   >>
>>>>   >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
>>>>
>>>> I think we should do this for the query specification in particular.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Redirection would be OK but leaving it in place with an additional
>>> yellow box linking to the new query document is my preference.
>>>
>>>          Andy
>>>
>>>> - Chime
>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
>> Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
>> University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
>> D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
>> Germany

Received on Tuesday, 26 March 2013 12:37:44 UTC