RE: flag or redirect the old RECs ?

Same here... +1

Axel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Birte Glimm [mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de]
> Sent: Sonntag, 24. März 2013 12:18
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ?
>
> +1 to the yellow box.
>
> Birte
>
> On 21 March 2013 15:36, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 21/03/13 13:35, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 21, 2013 9:28 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org
> >> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote:
> >>  >
> >>  > Take a look at this:
> >>  >
> >>  >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

> >>  >>
> >>  > Notice the yellow box?   Should we do that for
> >>  >>
> >>  >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

> >>
> >> I think we should do this for the query specification in particular.
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Redirection would be OK but leaving it in place with an additional
> > yellow box linking to the new query document is my preference.
> >
> >         Andy
> >
> >>
> >> - Chime
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
> Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
> University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
> D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
> Germany

Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 07:17:37 UTC