- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:17:05 +0100
- To: "birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de" <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Same here... +1 Axel > -----Original Message----- > From: Birte Glimm [mailto:birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de] > Sent: Sonntag, 24. März 2013 12:18 > To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > Subject: Re: flag or redirect the old RECs ? > > +1 to the yellow box. > > Birte > > On 21 March 2013 15:36, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote: > > > > > > On 21/03/13 13:35, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Mar 21, 2013 9:28 AM, "Sandro Hawke" <sandro@w3.org > >> <mailto:sandro@w3.org>> wrote: > >> > > >> > Take a look at this: > >> > > >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ > >> >> > >> > Notice the yellow box? Should we do that for > >> >> > >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/ > >> > >> I think we should do this for the query specification in particular. > > > > > > +1 > > > > Redirection would be OK but leaving it in place with an additional > > yellow box linking to the new query document is my preference. > > > > Andy > > > >> > >> - Chime > >> > > > > > > -- > Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125 > Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258 > University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188 > D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de > Germany
Received on Monday, 25 March 2013 07:17:37 UTC