RE: Remaining three PRs published

Dear all, 

> The main thing I should have said is: GET YOUR AC REP TO VOTE NOW PLEASE.

While you're at it, it would be nice if you could also collect testimonials from your organization (some paragraph or two on how great and useful SPARQL1.1 is for your organization). I don't know whether there's an official process for this, but for simplicity, I suggest we just collect them on the mailinglist: so please just send them with the subject: "SPARQL1.1 testimonial" to this list and we should publish them in a way similar to how it was done by SPARQL1.0, see:
   http://www.w3.org/2007/12/sparql-testimonial

If you have ideas to whom we could reach out from outside the group, I think it wouldn't do harm either to collect testimonials from others (e.g. implementers that sent us an implementation report). Let me know your suggestions and I can coordinate contacting them.

Thanks & best regards,
Axel



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sandro Hawke [mailto:sandro@w3.org]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. Jänner 2013 04:57
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Remaining three PRs published
> 
> On 01/29/2013 02:54 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> > http://www.w3.org/News/2013#entry-9700
> >
> 
> The main thing I should have said is: GET YOUR AC REP TO VOTE NOW PLEASE.
> 
> Their form is linked from each PR.   It's:
> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/33280/sparql11_pr2/
> 
> 
> >
> > Also, the WG was extended until April 1.   That should be properly
> > announced shortly.
> 
> That's been announced now.   It's actually 30 March.
> 
> But now I have a great idea: on April 1 I'll announce that SPARQL has been
> given a 5 year extension to work on SPARQL 1.2 and also SPARQL 2.0 which
> instead of looking like SQL will look like JSON (mongodb style).
> 
>            -- Sandro
>

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 07:13:44 UTC