- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 13:41:25 -0500
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Agree. The test should not have been marked approved. Le On 12/20/2012 1:29 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > On Dec 19, 2012, at 2:35 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > >> - As I mentioned, the temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 test is marked as approved, but commented out of the manifest list. I'm not sure what to do with it. > After digging into this a bit deeper, I think this was my fault. The test was approve here: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-01-31#resolution_3 > > That resolution says "approve all non-approved test cases at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/implementations/#sparql11-query". The state of the implementation report at the time of that resolution is in CVS at r1.10, and does *not* contain the temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 test. However, given the resolution text, I believe I went to the manifest and marked all tests in the file as approved, regardless of whether they had been commented out in the manifest list (which temporal-proximity-by-exclusion-minus-1 had). > > So unless somebody objects, I'm going to remove the approval status from that test (as it never should have been there in the first place), and then adjust my working patch of the test suite to remove that test completely (pending group approval on cleaning up the test suite of non-approved tests). > > thanks, > .greg > > >
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2012 18:41:50 UTC