Re: book-keeping & suggesting some PROPOSALs to approve per email

+1 from me

On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:00:33 Chime Ogbuji wrote:

+1 from me 


-- 
Chime Ogbuji
Sent with Sparrow


On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Birte Glimm 
wrote: 
+1 from me to all proposals


Birte


On 18 December 2012 15:44, Matthew Perry 
<matthew.perry@oracle.com> wrote:
+1 on all of these from me


- Matt




On 12/18/2012 5:29 AM, Polleres, Axel wrote:


Reading the recent comments and mails, it sounds to me 
that we probably may
need at least to make some


decisions (mostly book-keeping). I don’t think that any of 
these issues
prevent us from publishing


as planned, but it would be good to have them clarified:






I see the following:


1) Minor editorial fixes in drafts before publication
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
dawg/2012OctDec/0211.html


2) Test suite bugs


3) Removing uncommented test cases






I hope we can sort these things out per email, so I’m giving 
it a try,
please post your replies or comments to the following 
proposals to the list:






PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in query as per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
dawg/2012OctDec/0210.html


PROPOSED: approve editorial fix in Overview as per
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-
dawg/2012OctDec/0209.html


PROPOSED: remove all unapproved test cases from the 
manifests (and move
them to a separate folder for “unapproved” test cases)






If a sufficient quorum has time and enthusiasm to gather 
on IRC today at the
regular time, maybe some of the things can be sorted 
out/further discussed
there quickly (unfortunately, I won’t be able to make it). 
Otherwise, just
in case, if we have any concerns on the proposals above 
which we can’t sort
out per email I suggest:






PROPOSED: Telco: 15 Jan 2013, Time of Call: 15:00 UK, 
10:00 (East US) …
if any of the proposals above raises objections






FWIW, I vote “+1” to all of the above.






Best regards,


Axel






p.s.: this does not yet contain any proposal on how to 
proceed with the
comment we got on the protocol validator, cf.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-
comments/2012Dec/0006.html
... hope this will sorty out per email, if


someone more swapped in could take care, it’d be 
appreciated!






-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany