- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 10:12:48 +0000
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- CC: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 18/12/12 10:10, Polleres, Axel wrote: > How about - for now - commenting them out in the > turtle (with a comment why it was removed)? OK but that seems the same as removing them because its not in the triples. It's already commented out (with reason) in the manifest, but that does not seem to be enough. Andy > > Axel > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com] >> Sent: Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012 10:54 >> To: SPARQL Working Group >> Subject: Fwd: possible bug in SPARQL syntax test suite >> >> We ought to remove inactive tests! >> >> Andy >> >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: possible bug in SPARQL syntax test suite >> Resent-Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 01:36:52 +0000 >> Resent-From: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org >> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:36:14 +1300 >> From: Jeen Broekstra <jeen.broekstra@gmail.com> >> To: public-rdf-dawg-comments@w3.org >> >> In running the syntax tests over the latest update of the SPARQL test suite, I >> encountered the following positive test, which fails for me: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/qname- >> escape-01.rq >> >> The query is the following: >> >> PREFIX og: <http://ogp.me/ns#> >> SELECT * WHERE { >> ?page og:audio\:title ?title >> } >> >> As far as I can tell, this test case is out of date: colons in prefixed >> localnames are no longer to be escaped, and grammar production PN_LOCAL_ESC >> (see http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rPN_LOCAL_ESC) >> does no longer contain the ':' character as a legal value for escaping. >> >> There is a negative syntax test which covers exactly the same issue: >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/syntax-query/syn-bad- >> pname-06.rq >> >> Query: >> >> PREFIX : <http://example/> >> SELECT * >> { >> :a :b :c\:z . >> } >> >> Clearly, these two tests are contradicting each other, and I suspect that the >> first one should be removed. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jeen >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 10:13:23 UTC