- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:20:56 +0100
- To: "axel.polleres@siemens.com Polleres" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Ok, problem solved. It turned out that resolving conflicts just works quite different from SVN and there was some hidden conflict in my working copy. Birte On 4 December 2012 12:11, Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de> wrote: > Hi all, > > I tried to do my action of marking tests as approved, but I cannot > commit or update to the CVS any more. I just get: > > The server reported an error while performing the "cvs update" > command. (took 0:01.774) > Error: SPARQL: The server did not provide any additional information. > *** > > which is indeed not very helpful. I tried to check out the sources > again, with the same problem. Am I the only one who has this problem? > Can you commit/update? > > Cheers, > > Birte > > On 4 December 2012 08:21, Axel Polleres <axel@polleres.net> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> Looking over the last two weeks' minutes, I think we have to talk about the following things: >> >> 1) review ACTIONs >> 2) decide a plan when to vote for PR/Rec, my impression is: >> Protocol: Exit criterion is met as per http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-20#resolution_3 >> --> Ready to vote for PR >> GSP: Exit criterion is met as per http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-27#resolution_3 >> --> Ready for PR >> Entailment: Exit criterion is met for all but RIF Entailment as per http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2012-11-27#resolution_2 >> --> 2 alternatives: >> a) we go to PR now and makr RIF Entailment as informative >> b) we give it another week or two, but define a clear roadmap what to be done when >> (e.g. additional RIF test cases by next week ready for approval, passed by two engines by >> in two weeks means we make RIF entailment normative, otherwise, we leave RIF entailment as >> informative) >> 3) As for the docs already in PR, I see not comments or issues that keep us from progressing to REC, but probably we want to go to REC with all docs at the same time. >> >> My goal would be to vote for PR for the missing docs either next week or in two weeks (also pending availability in two weeks, e.g. I am afraid, I am at risk already >> for 18th, os personally). >> >> Please let me know if I missed anything! >> >> best, >> Axel >> >> -- >> Dr. Axel Polleres >> url: http://www.polleres.net/ twitter: AxelPolleres >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125 > Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258 > University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188 > D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de > Germany -- Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125 Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258 University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188 D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de Germany
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2012 11:21:31 UTC