- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:10:15 +0100
- To: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all (this time reply all), I am afraid I have to send late regrets. Regarding the "Decide on whether to keep RIF as normative" it probably is worth mentioning that RIF is marked as at risk and the same concerns still also apply to the OWL Direct and RDF-Based Semantics. Jeff Pan is still working on providing test results (OWL Direct Semantics) as is Michael Schneider (OWL RDF-Based Semantics). We hopefully get more RDF(S) reports (some are promised) and possibly OWL RL (just covering what is in the profile and not covering all OWL Direct and RDF-Based Inferencing). All in all, I am not sure whether we want to decide about the at risk features already now. Birte On 27 November 2012 06:47, Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> wrote: > In short form: > > Approve entailment tests listed in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0159.html > Check on (expected, actual) implementation status of new RIF tests in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0168.html > > Decide on whether to keep RIF as normative > > Approve GSP tests listed in > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012OctDec/0174.html > Confirm GSP implementation status as per thread between Chime and Andy > Confirm protocol "OK" status > Check in on ACTION-720 - Paul to summarize unapproved update tests > > > talk to you all in a few hours, > Lee > -- Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm Tel.: +49 731 50 24125 Inst. of Artificial Intelligence Secr: +49 731 50 24258 University of Ulm Fax: +49 731 50 24188 D-89069 Ulm birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de Germany
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 15:10:46 UTC