- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 08:20:56 -0400
- To: birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
- CC: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
That's correct, Birte. We'd like it as an appendix and then there will be a standard Status section that links to the appendix. This way we can have a consistent SotD section for all documents. Lee On 11/1/2012 4:09 AM, Birte Glimm wrote: > I've put this at the end of the document (appendix) since it seemed to > me from the minutes that Sandro wanted it out of the status section, > but I haven't been at the teleconf, so I might misinterpret the > minutes. > > Birte > > On 31 October 2012 20:03, Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I started putting the "Changes since LC" section into the Update document, cf. >> >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/Overview.xml#changes-since-lc >> >> For completing ACTION-707, I suggest to put this in the same format (i.e move the different versions of how changes were summarized under >> the same header and anchor, at the end of the Status sectionfor each document) across all documents, that is: >> ------------ >> <div id="changes-since-lc"> >> <p><b>Changes since Last Call</b></p> >> <p>The following editorial changes have been made since <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-update-20120105/">Last Call</a> publication of this document:</p> >> ... >> </div> >> ----------- >> >> Since I won't get to this before Friday, if any of the editors has time to do it themselves for their reps. documents, >> feel free to follow the example. >> >> Thanks for the help, >> Axel >> > >
Received on Friday, 2 November 2012 12:21:19 UTC