RE: Deprecation of 'Integer' production in SPARQL 1.1

> I think it is better to record this item but publish as-is,
> which is the grammar the tests are being run against.

+1

Axel


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Seaborne [mailto:andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2012 10:24
> To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Deprecation of 'Integer' production in SPARQL 1.1
>
> Thomas,
>
> Your right - it's not needed any more but it is harmless.
>
> However, removing it would change the numbering so it is not
> a point change.
>
> I think it is better to record this item but publish as-is,
> which is the grammar the tests are being run against.
>
>       Andy
>
> On 05/10/12 16:19, Thomas Visel wrote:
> > Between the May 2011 and July 2012 versions of the SPARQL 1.1 spec,
> > the /Pathmod/ production was revised.  It previously referenced the
> > /Integer/ production (now on line 97) below.  After the
> revision, the
> > latter production is no longer referenced (July 2012 numbering):
> >
> > /[97] //Integer/ = /INTEGER
> > <http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rINTEGER>/
> >
> > If this is so, the /Integer/ production should be removed.
> >
> > My regards,
> >
> > Thomas
> >
> > Algebraix Data
> >
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2012 09:44:25 UTC