- From: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 10:41:33 -0300
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Cc: "lee@thefigtrees.net" <lee@thefigtrees.net>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wednesday 03 October 2012 09:08:25 Polleres, Axel wrote: > Looks ok (shall we - independent of the reply - add this to the Future work > items list?) +1 > > Axel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lee Feigenbaum [mailto:figtree@gmail.com] On Behalf Of > > Lee Feigenbaum > > Sent: Dienstag, 02. Oktober 2012 19:43 > > To: Carlos Buil Aranda > > Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > > Subject: Re: draft response to Peter Wharer 2 > > > > I made some small edits. It's ok with me as is. > > > > Anyone else? > > > > Lee > > > > On 10/2/2012 1:37 PM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: > > > Hi Lee, > > > > > > I updated the response. > > > > > > cheers, > > > > > > Carlos > > > > > > On Tuesday 02 October 2012 13:29:03 Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > > >> Hi Carlos, > > >> > > >> I don't think that we have consensus that we would want a way to > > > > > > specify > > > > > >> the dataset for a SERVICE call, so I would weaken that > > > > part of your > > > > >> response a bit. Perhaps you could say something like that > > > > the group > > > > >> opted for the current design for simplicity, and hopes to > > > > learn more > > > > >> about how datasets interact with federated query from > > > > implementation > > > > >> experience in order to inform future standardization? > > >> > > >> Lee > > >> > > >> On 10/2/2012 11:59 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: > > >>> Dear all, > > >>> > > >>> here you can find a drafted response for Peter Warer: > > >>> > > >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PW2 > > >>> > > >>> cheers, > > >>> > > >>> Carlos
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2012 13:42:11 UTC