- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 13:43:21 -0400
- To: Carlos Buil Aranda <cbuilaranda@gmail.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
I made some small edits. It's ok with me as is. Anyone else? Lee On 10/2/2012 1:37 PM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: > Hi Lee, > > I updated the response. > > cheers, > > Carlos > > On Tuesday 02 October 2012 13:29:03 Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >> Hi Carlos, >> >> I don't think that we have consensus that we would want a way to > specify >> the dataset for a SERVICE call, so I would weaken that part of your >> response a bit. Perhaps you could say something like that the group >> opted for the current design for simplicity, and hopes to learn more >> about how datasets interact with federated query from implementation >> experience in order to inform future standardization? >> >> Lee >> >> On 10/2/2012 11:59 AM, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> here you can find a drafted response for Peter Warer: >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PW2 >>> >>> cheers, >>> >>> Carlos
Received on Tuesday, 2 October 2012 17:43:53 UTC