- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:28:41 +0200
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
P.s.: 4) we may also want to check whether there's any conclusion we can reach on the issue raised by Andy on interplay of aggregates? Last mail in that thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012AprJun/0198.html Talk later & Best, Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Siemens AG Österreich Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies CT T CEE Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859 Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Polleres, Axel > Sent: Tuesday, 5 June 2012 8:50 AM > To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > Subject: Agenda: SPARQL TC today > > As per last week's minutes, we plan a short telecon checking > on actions and try to make make progress where we can, > particularly, I suggest to quickly run through > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR through the docs > that weren't covered last week. If the editors could check > the resp. sections and add any items/open comments they are > ware of, that'd help! > > Accordingly: > > 1) ACTION review > 2) Run through http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR > * Update, > * Entailment > * 2 x Result formats > 3) Comments... My question would be whether or not we need to > treat those two as official comments: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2 > 012Jun/0001.html (went to several lists at once) > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2 > 012Jun/0002.html (already informally answered by Andy) > > > Best, > Axel > > -- > Dr. Axel Polleres > Siemens AG Österreich > Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & > Technologies CT T CEE > > Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983 > Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859 > Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 10:29:11 UTC