- From: Polleres, Axel <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 08:49:42 +0200
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As per last week's minutes, we plan a short telecon checking on actions and try to make make progress where we can, particularly, I suggest to quickly run through http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR through the docs that weren't covered last week. If the editors could check the resp. sections and add any items/open comments they are ware of, that'd help!
Accordingly:
1) ACTION review
2) Run through http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/To_PR
* Update,
* Entailment
* 2 x Result formats
3) Comments... My question would be whether or not we need to treat those two as official comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jun/0001.html (went to several lists at once)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2012Jun/0002.html (already informally answered by Andy)
Best,
Axel
--
Dr. Axel Polleres
Siemens AG Österreich
Corporate Technology Central Eastern Europe Research & Technologies
CT T CEE
Tel.: +43 (0) 51707-36983
Mobile: +43 (0) 664 88550859
Fax: +43 (0) 51707-56682 mailto:axel.polleres@siemens.com
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 06:50:10 UTC