- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 15:07:30 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 12/04/12 12:46, Polleres, Axel wrote: > Thanks, Andy, > > For the moment, we can live without it for our use case, > would anybody support to put propagating all op:... operator > delegations for basic arithmetics from Xpath/Xquery operators > on the future work items list? It would seem strange because this (and the last ) WGs decided on a smaller code set to reduce the implementation costs of meeting the SPARQL spec. It makes the future items a bit of a dumping ground - not useful input to a rechartering. But whatever. We have the extensibility already. The extensions commonly added to impls is a better guide to standardisation IMO. The LDP charter includes work on a core set of datatypes so it is covered. (and that includes XMLLiterals for XHTML so much fun elsewhere.) Andy
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 14:08:10 UTC