Re: draft response for property path commenters from Matthew Perry on 2012-04-12 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from April to June 2012)

From: Matthew Perry <matthew.perry@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
To: <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <946fd43d-1445-4a13-9327-c1ad76ec3914@default>

Looks good to me too.

Thanks Lee.

- Matt


----- Original Message -----
From: andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com
To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 6:42:21 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: draft response for property path commenters



On 12/04/12 02:49, Gregory Williams wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2012, at 9:23 PM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> Please let me know if you think this is OK or should be changed at all.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:PropertyPathComments
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> .greg
>
>

Very good - nicely covers the key points.

 Andy

Received on Thursday, 12 April 2012 12:06:16 UTC