- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 22:05:56 -0400
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
As per ACTION-605, I reached out to our property path commenters and asked if our current resolution to the property path comments satisfied their concerns. Summary: the commenters are not thrilled with the design choices the group has made in resolving their comments on property path evaluation performance; some of them do believe that the new design addresses the performance concerns, while others are unsure or chose to remain silent. You can read the discussion (note that it is strictly unofficial) at: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Apr/0013.html Tomorrow, we should decide whether--based on this feedback--we wish to adjust last week's resolution, or if we should stick with it. My recommendation is that we stay with our decision. We had a strong consensus on it last week, and I believe that it is a well-motivated, conservative design that does address the Last Call comments, while leaving room for property paths to be extended and improved in subsequent standardization rounds. Lee
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 02:06:25 UTC