- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:16:17 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On 01/04/12 21:32, Polleres, Axel wrote: > 6) change the semantics of * and + only, leave everything else as in LC, cf. > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0285.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2012JanMar/0286.html > - Requires a new last call > - May lead to formal objections within the working group? > ± unsure whether it addresses commenters (mixing counting and non-counting) > + more intuitive for common reachability use cases than option 3 6.A: /, |, ! as there are in 2LC. 6.B: *, +, ? are non-counting 6.C: No DISTINCT 6.D: No {} forms: {n}, {n,m}, {n,}, {,m} Option 6 also removes the {} forms. + Leaves the syntax open for the future e.g. {*}, {?length}, {?length>5} + {n,} is currently defined depending on * + {n,m} for large m-n, has the similar computability issues (WM-1) Andy
Received on Monday, 2 April 2012 08:17:02 UTC