Re: Options on Property paths

On Apr 1, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Polleres, Axel wrote:

> 7) Add ALL(path) only, and change default to DISTINCT(path)
>    - Requires a new last call
>    - May lead to formal objections within the working group?
>    - lock-in to non-counting semantics as default
>    + addresses commenters (for sure JP-4, who suggested this, not sure about JB-10, WM-1)
>    + more intuitive for common reachability use cases than option 3

I don't think having distinct semantics for all path operators is more intuitive for things like :p/:q. I think the intuitive understanding of / is the rewriting semantics we've got right now. Does anybody think otherwise?

thanks,
.greg

Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 22:21:46 UTC