- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 18:21:18 -0400
- To: "Polleres, Axel" <axel.polleres@siemens.com>
- Cc: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Apr 1, 2012, at 4:32 PM, Polleres, Axel wrote: > 7) Add ALL(path) only, and change default to DISTINCT(path) > - Requires a new last call > - May lead to formal objections within the working group? > - lock-in to non-counting semantics as default > + addresses commenters (for sure JP-4, who suggested this, not sure about JB-10, WM-1) > + more intuitive for common reachability use cases than option 3 I don't think having distinct semantics for all path operators is more intuitive for things like :p/:q. I think the intuitive understanding of / is the rewriting semantics we've got right now. Does anybody think otherwise? thanks, .greg
Received on Sunday, 1 April 2012 22:21:46 UTC