- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:24:27 +0100
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I put this on my low priority issues' list for now... Ivan On Dec 6, 2011, at 19:18 , Axel Polleres wrote: > Hi Ivan, Sandro, > > While reviewing SPARQL1.1 service description, I had the following remark: > >>> 13) 3.2.14 sd:resultFormat >>> >>> (non-critical) A side remark on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ... shouldn't e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON have at least an RDFa triple stating: >>> >>> <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON> a <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Format> . >>> >>> ? >> > Greg's answer: > >> Maybe? I don't have strong feelings about this, as the data is available via conneg in RDF/XML and Turtle. If you think RDFa is necessary, we can talk with Ivan about what it would take to add it. > > So, would it be possible/useful to add these type triples? > > cheers, > Axel ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 18:25:07 UTC