- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 19:18:12 +0100
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi Ivan, Sandro, While reviewing SPARQL1.1 service description, I had the following remark: > > 13) 3.2.14 sd:resultFormat > > > > (non-critical) A side remark on http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ ... shouldn't e.g. http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON have at least an RDFa triple stating: > > > > <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/SPARQL_Results_JSON> a <http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/Format> . > > > > ? > Greg's answer: > Maybe? I don't have strong feelings about this, as the data is available via conneg in RDF/XML and Turtle. If you think RDFa is necessary, we can talk with Ivan about what it would take to add it. So, would it be possible/useful to add these type triples? cheers, Axel
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 18:18:44 UTC