Re: Comment Response HSt-1 (D-Entailment & xsd:hexBinary & xsd:base64Binary)

On 3 December 2011 20:06, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> That looks ok to me.
>
> I would be happier though if there was some encouragement for Henry's document to use the canonical form, rather than deliberately introducing extra whitespace, thereby requiring a (presumably) uncommon feature from the SPARQL systems.


I now added:
As you suggest, it would also be possible to use SPARQL endpoints that
do not support D-entailment, provided that users & applications use
only use canonical forms of literals, e.g., without whitespace.

Birte
> - Steve
>
> On 3 Dec 2011, at 18:50, Birte Glimm wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I drafted a coment response for Hensy Story's comment:
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HSt-1
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Birte
>>
>> --
>> Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
>> Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
>> University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
>> D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
>> Germany
>>
>
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>



-- 
Jun. Prof. Dr. Birte Glimm            Tel.:    +49 731 50 24125
Inst. of Artificial Intelligence         Secr:  +49 731 50 24258
University of Ulm                         Fax:   +49 731 50 24188
D-89069 Ulm                               birte.glimm@uni-ulm.de
Germany

Received on Sunday, 4 December 2011 17:02:11 UTC