Re: has anyone implemented SPARQL 1.1 yet?

I know negative answers aren't very helpful, but we don't have a complete implementation, and aren't going to by Jan either.

- Steve

On 24 Nov 2011, at 15:13, Sandro Hawke wrote:

> It was very heartening the other day to hear that an At Risk feature
> already had multiple implementations.    That makes me wonder if we can
> skip the Candidate Recommendation phase.   Procedurally, CR occurs after
> Last Call, when we're waiting to get two implementations of every
> feature, and/or otherwise making sure the spec can be implemented
> interoperably.   
> 
> If even the At-Risk feature is implemented, I wonder if that means we
> have some folks who've already implemented everything else, too.   If
> that's true, we could go straight from Last Call to Proposed Rec (which
> then leads to Rec with minimal work from the group), skipping CR and
> saving a 1-3 months.
> 
> If we're going to do that, or potentially do that, we should say so as
> we go to our Second Last Call, which is part of why I'm asking now.
> 
> So, does anyone have an implementation that's feature complete for
> SPARQL 1.1, or very likely to be by, oh, the end of January?   If you'll
> be there except for one or two things, what are those things?
> 
> (Thinking about it, I expect we might have some problems with ER on this
> front.  Has anyone been implementing ER?  Does anyone plan to?   I'd
> expect Birte, Chime, and Paul might be doing something here....  Maybe
> C&P.   I also wonder if anyone has implemented anything that consumes
> Service Descriptions, but perhaps that's not really necessary.)
> 
>    -- Sandro
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
+44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD

Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 15:48:44 UTC