- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:33:36 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Hi all,
Just to understand the impact here: didn't we decide to stick with RDF1.0 for SPARQL1.1 and reflect such things only in a separate Note?
Maybe we can discuss this briebly under the liaison item in today's TelCo.
best,
Axel
On 15 Nov 2011, at 12:39, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> RDF 1.1 will have datatypes for all literals. Plain literals are either
> xsd;String (no lang tag) or rdf:langString (with language tag).
>
> I've changed SPARQL's DATATYPE to reflect this.
>
> Two tests are affected: one in SPARQL 1.0, one in SPARQL 1.1
>
> From SPARQL 1.0:
>
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/expr-builtin/q-datatype-2.rq
>
> From SPARQL 1.1:
> functions/if01.rq
>
> I've changed if01.rq so that it records what I think is the correct
> answers but has this lost some of the intention of the test?
>
> == Query
>
> BASE <http://example.org/>
> PREFIX xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#>
>
> SELECT ?o (if(( datatype(?o) = xsd:integer ), true, false) AS ?integer)
> WHERE
> { ?s ?p ?o }
>
> == Old results
> ------------------------------
> | o | integer |
> ===============================
> | "123" | false |
> | "日本語"@ja | |
> | "english"@en | |
> | "français"@fr | |
> | "abc"^^xsd:string | false |
> | "def"^^xsd:string | false |
> | 7 | true |
> -------------------------------
>
> == New results
> ------------------------------
> | o | integer |
> ===============================
> | "123" | false |
> | "def"^^xsd:string | false |
> | "français"@fr | false |
> | "日本語"@ja | false |
> | 7 | true |
> | "abc"^^xsd:string | false |
> | "english"@en | false |
> -------------------------------
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 13:34:07 UTC